kelly_holden wrote:If Dan Radcliffe was shaving by GoF (which I haven't really seen evidence of), it was because he was an early developer, not because he was too old, because they did manage a year a film for the first few HP movies, they just couldn't keep it up. Plus, Harry's rate of physical development wasn't part of the plot, so the rate he aged at didn't matter so long as it was realistic, while parts of Artemis's growing process are part of the plot.
Erm, okay. I didn't actually mean it to be a major argumentative point. Apologies if you didn't take it that way, either, but it's nearly 2am here, so I'm sort of out of it, and your response seems a little impassioned to me. And, not trying to start anything here, but Daniel Radcliffe was going on 16 when they filmed GoF. That's most definitely not early.
But yes, I get what you mean about Artemis's aging being important. All factors concerned, especially the ones you just pointed out in your last post, live action is not really a viable option. But I wish it was.
Ninety-eight percent of teenagers copy and paste made-up facts into their signature. If you're part of the two percent that unwittingly fell into this trap while attempting to mock them, copy and paste this into your signature.